Comments on: cheap health insurance policy

By: gaelic86

gaelic86 — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:07:46 +0000

Hey dingbat if you reduced the budget for the DEPT of WAR by 25% and applied the amount to pay for universal health care, everyone in the USA would be covered without raising taxes.

By: ANGLEBOOT

ANGLEBOOT — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:23:19 +0000

BULLSHIT!!! just since Obama been in office taxs have gone up on just about everything. 22 new deparments of government have been open. How are we going to pay for that,NEW TAXS!!
the governmet will charge a tax just to bring the troops home.

By: SteveKopekne

SteveKopekne — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:35:57 +0000

Re third party, I already said insurance was a third party, what’s your point?

Um, NoelleTs, the police and fire are not national programs but local. Not all localities handle then the same way. Some don’t even have them. And even if they were socialized at the national level, are you really trying to make the argument that if we have one socialized agency then we should have no objection to making any other socialized? i.e. Once we let one in, we may as well become a fully socialist country?

By: SteveKopekne

SteveKopekne — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:34:13 +0000

No kidding, Angleboot, and these people want to put the people responsible for this budget in control of healthcare? lol, the the sky is the limit! Of course the government can make it look like your health care is cheaper, they just defer the cost to your grandkid’s grandkids!

By: SteveKopekne

SteveKopekne — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 00:48:11 +0000

And of course, there goes the privacy of your medical records. One the government holds them they’ll never need a subpeona to get them. Oh, but right, the government never, ever, abuses their power, right?

By: ANGLEBOOT

ANGLEBOOT — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:52:40 +0000

that’s what I can’t get some to see. Local taxs are mostly for local property owners, not the whole nation. They would really be paying high taxs if the fed taxs for local fire and police. the if their local payed in more, they would still get less, after the governmnet and their “robinhood plans”.

By: SteveKopekne

SteveKopekne — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:49:35 +0000

Because they are so blinded by their ideology that facts and reasonable arguments that disagree with them don’t register with them. I saw one single payer advocate saying something like “the health care insurance industry is making 117% profit compared to 5% for the S&P”. Never mind that “117% profit” is mathematically impossible and the health care insurance profits average the same as the S&P at 5%…. You can only say something that stupid if you are blinded by your ideology.

By: jfouratt

jfouratt — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:37:09 +0000

selfishness and greed is undermining the very principles of equality that this country was founded on these selfish rants about taxes without any con

By: jfouratt

jfouratt — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:49:44 +0000

text and without a seeming understanding that some people are profiting off keeping the average joe, jane, Juan, LaToya and Mei Woo frombeing able to know that their families will be provided the necessary quality health care when their family finds themselves dealing with a health issue.

By: jfouratt

jfouratt — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:32:21 +0000

Greed and selfishness are un-American ….. We all can learn fron the European models of health care and make our own US version. Name calling is a cheap shot … and unless those people here commenting belong to the millionaire class they are being blinded to the reality of their and their neighbors health insurance empending crisis.